Archive for October, 2010

How to Climb an Altar and the Invention of Underwear.


I know this clip only has a tertiary relation to the post, but hey, it’s Monty Python.

Finally, after many diversions, we are back to the Bible. C’mon, you know the one, the end-all of moral guidance, the be-all of spiritual well-being, and of course, the book that tells of the invention of underwear. What? You didn’t know? Biblical illiteracy is so sad, but just wait, you ignorant bastards. The Blessed Atheist knows what you need. You’ll see.

Exodus 20/18

So the Ten Commandments have just been given to mankind, and it is such a great gift that all the people are so in awe that they are standing at a distance, terrified of the special effects Moses has created on the mountain. I mean fire, smoke and loud noises, and just how the hell could anyone mimic those? Obviously, it was by divine action for who could have ever thought of the clever idea of setting the mountain on fire and banging on a drum. That was obviously way beyond the technology of the time. Holy shit man, think! It’s fire!

All the people perceived the thunder and the lightning flashes and the sound of the trumpet and the mountain smoking; and when the people saw it, they trembled and stood at a distance. Then they said to Moses, “Speak to us yourself and we will listen; but let not God speak to us, or we will die.” Moses said to the people, “Do not be afraid; for God has come in order to test you, and in order that the fear of Him may remain with you, so that you may not sin.”

Now Old Moses has the people worked up into a quaking and foaming terror. They beg him not to let God talk to them directly for they must be killed by the mere sound of their all-loving and perfect God. He couldn’t have toned it down a bit? Hmmm? But he doesn’t seem to be able to. Let’s look closer at events because it’s obvious that the Hebrews are in no shape to do so. Moses has them so witless they are pissing in their loin cloths. In this state, he can do anything with them, anything!

Think about cult leaders we all have read about and you will realize that this is purposeful. In their terror, they will see what he says is there. Intimidated, they’ll not look too closely at the “miracle” he has wrought, and he can’t let them get too close and has warned them more than once about setting foot on the mountain. Keep in mind that anyone who comes close will be stoned to death. If you keep everyone afraid and at a distance, the smoke and mirrors work wonderfully. Let them get too close, however, and they begin to see the illusion.

But it is that last line that I find most interesting. On admitting their fear, Moses seems to allay it, right? “Do not be afraid,” he says. Does he mean this? Is he trying to put them at ease? A careful look at the next line clears those questions right up. “for God has come in order to test you, and in order that the fear of Him may remain with you, so that you may not sin.” Let’s paraphrase that, shall we? “Don’t be afraid for God is here to test you and make you so afraid that you obey him and make that fear live within you for the rest of your life. Then you’ll be so fearful that you’ll never piss God (or Moses) off by thinking for yourself.”

So now that Moses has re-stoked their terror, he approaches “God” alone for further instructions. God at this time is a cloud, a thick cloud. Really! I’m serious! He’s not some 600 foot bronze figure striding around the hilltop. He’s a wispy bit of vapor. Again God tells Moses to never worship other gods because if they did Moses wouldn’t be in charge anymore. Well, that’s how I interpret it anyway, but you’ll all notice the repetition here. Apparently, God wasn’t quite sure if Moses heard the second commandment or not. Perhaps, Yahweh speaks with a lisp or got a bit wasted that morning and was slurring his words. Who knows!

‘You shall make an altar of earth for Me, and you shall sacrifice on it your burnt offerings and your peace offerings, your sheep and your oxen; in every place where I cause My name to be remembered, I will come to you and bless you.

So build an earthen mound and start killing stuff on it because killing stuff makes God happy. If anyone ever tells you that God doesn’t demand worship, please point out their bullshit by using this verse. “You shall make an altar! You shall sacrifice!” This is the same language used in the ten commandments, “You shall,” and we all know that those weren’t optional. Therefore, God demands worship and sacrifice. Why? Because perfection has needs! Perfection needs bitches, dammit! Why be perfect if someone isn’t going to proclaim it constantly. Duh!

‘If you make an altar of stone for Me, you shall not build it of cut stones, for if you wield your tool on it, you will profane it.’

Oddly, God doesn’t like cut stones. We don’t know why, nor do we care much. Although, wielding your “tool” on it, if you know what I mean, would “profane” many things in my eyes also. Ooh! The visual that idea stirred actually triggered a bit of gag reflex. Sad when I disgust even myself. It’s the boilermaker coming out in me. Sorry.

I do have to wonder how they cut stones with “it” though. Never mind! I don’t think I could deal with the suggestions.

But now comes the event you’ve all been waiting for.

‘And you shall not go up by steps to My altar, so that your nakedness will not be exposed on it.’

First we have a proscription against use of your “tool” and now underwear. Now before you think that I’ve lead you astray, let me quote from the notes of my Study Bible. “Men who ascended stepped altars would expose their nakedness in the presence of God. Although Aaron and his descendants served at stepped altars, they were instructed to wear linen undergarments.” Hence Biblical confirmation of the historicity of underwear. Yay! God blesses us so. Nothing about the germ theory of disease or crop rotation but, goddamn it man, we got underwear. Unfortunately, the Bible does not clear up the question of whether they were boxers or briefs so, alas, the war rages on.

Why this all this disgust with the naked human body? A great question because I was raised to believe we were made in God’s own image. Is he so ashamed of his own little pecker that he can’t tolerate anyone else showing of their manliness? Does he have a sensitive stomach? What is with these Abrahamic religions and their nudity taboos? The more fundamentalist they get, the more skin they cover. Personally, I think Abraham must have gotten a hell of a sunburn after a night of heavy drinking and vowed to never go unclothed again. Hey, it makes sense. They live in a desert after all!

To tell the truth, there is a double negative in that sentence so it could mean that God wants his priests to flash their willies at him. That would explain all those Catholic scandals of the last few decade. The perv! Or maybe I should write The Perv!

Fascinating is it, though? The Good Book gives the prohibition of murder one short line, four whole words, but building altars to the greatness of God? That gets 12 lines and 96 words not including the second mention of idol banning, of course. Shows where we rank, huh?

On the serious side, I keep returning to the fear part, “that the fear of Him may remain with you, so that you may not sin.” Doesn’t this sound like a fine life? Fear and terror lurking over your shoulder as long as you live, terrified that God will bring judgement onto your head for sinful lapses. It’s much like that famous sermon preached by Jonathan Edwards in the early 18th century “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God!” I’ll give it to those Calvinists. They do come up with some mighty catchy titles for their stock of hate and fear.

Can you now see how religion becomes a security blanket making all who follow it feel safe and warm. Yeah… Me neither.

Truly, fear and hope are the two most powerful weapons in anyone’s arsenal. Fear of pain. Fear of death. Hope of some relief. Hope of some salvation. Religions capitalize on these most potent of arms better than everyone else for they can extend the range of both threats and redemption far beyond a mere mortal life. They convince their followers that the suffering is indefinite, the rewards eternal.

They up the ante of the game betting heavily and forcing all others to call. They demand you match their imaginary bets with your real life. They play with make-believe funds and you play with very real and precious hours and days and years.

The only real solution is not to call their bluff. It’s to fold, simply fold. The way to win is to not play. Just lay your cards down and walk away.

This is a game unworthy of us.

Defending Atheism: Writing Softly and Carrying a Big Stick.


I had an email last night and responded.  I thought I’d share it to my readers for comment.  Again the names and addresses have been change to protect the ignorant…  Sorry, I just couldn’t help myself.  I may have been a little too confrontational for I held back little.

On Oct 24, 2010, at 8:09 AM, Penner wrote:

Name: Penner

Wow…you have developed some phenomially successful ways to protect yourself from the truth…sort of the COME TO ME SO I CAN SLAME YOU approach.

Makes me wonder what your real bottom line actually is…

Time: Sunday October 24, 2010 at 7:09 am

My reply follows.

Mr. (Ms.?) Penner.

The truth, of which you so highly speak, is always confirmed by evidence, as much as we can gather.  In contrast, the evidence for your idea of the universe is nonexistent.  God is a made up hypothesis created by bronze age goat herders, nothing more.  While a tough and admirable people, I’m hardly willing to use them as a basis for all modern morality and ethics.  I use a vulgar type of humor to shock people on the sidelines of the great debate enough to have them actually think about their superstitions and woo based beliefs.  So many people have never even considered the possibility of questioning their beliefs, and I simply give them an opportunity.  I prod them just right knowing that they will be angry but also knowing that, perhaps years later, they may complete their journey to reason.  I plant seeds.

Mr. (Ms.) Penner,  I don’t actually like to cause pain or get people upset, but I find the evangelical/young earth creationist mindset so dangerous to modern life that I must fight it.  Nuclear weapons in the hands of bronze age religions is as absurd as it is reality.  Science has raised us from the primitives not religion.  To grasp on to religion, to cling to faith in spite of scientific evidence to the contrary will only lead us back to those dim times.  Christians were in charge of the world for a thousand years, and we call the majority of that time The Dark Ages for a reason. The evidence you have or the arguments you present are the same as those given by the Moslems, the Jews, the Hindus and the New agers which is to say no evidence at all.  Theists always use the same plodding arguments and base massive beliefs on a few small assumptions, desperately clinging to lies to avoid the pain of realizing they’ve been wrong their entire lives.

I merely point out the fallacy in the assumptions and beliefs, and I consider it the best thing I can do for humanity.  It’s a task I don’t get paid for and one for which I receive no glory, yet it’s one which I will continue to do.  If I can save a single person from the bonds of blind superstition, It’ll have all been worth it.  The bottom line is the truth for which we have proof.  Evidence based science has us building layer on previous layer of rational work pushing the human race higher than it’s ever been.  Religion, in contrast, just has us milling about on the same level often killing others on that level who happen to disagree about made up “facts”.

Science makes a difference.  Religion just gives us the illusion that we are.

It’s a little harsh, I know, but I still feel it’s needed.  In some cases a little slap may be all it takes.  So that in mind, I’d like to start a discussion on angry atheists. Is being too confrontational a bad thing?  Is it retarding the rationalization of humanity?

My thoughts have always been to use all levels, all strategies.  The civil rights movement needed both Martin Luther King and Malcolm X.  The anti-slavery movement needed both Sojourner Truth and John Brown.  We need both kind accommodationists and fervent Gnu Atheists.  We need to take all paths; we need to use every honest non-violent strategy.  We need to coddle and we need to insult.  We need to push and pull and prod and entice and, if necessary, hit with a (metaphorical) stick.  We need to be heard.

That being said, I want to hear from you.  And be honest!  Above all, we need to demand that.

 

 

Rocks and Dogs, Really?


The following video was sent to me by faithful, long-time reader Alice.  It is a brilliant and logical lecture on the fundamentals of atheism and related beliefs, well worth our while.  I admit, it put things in a new perspective for even me.

Excellent.  My favorite line is “Those who can’t approach discussion with a basic level of intelligence and maturity shouldn’t expect to be taken seriously.”  That should eliminate about nine-tenths of the opposition, I would think.  I also loved the bit about why atheists are fervent.  So true. So true.  I will have to check out the rest of their videos.  Thank you, Alice.

Ah hell!  I just had to throw this one out there too.  What a great evolutionary primer.

Damn!  I like that guy!  Go look.  There are many more in a similar vein.

Oh, do I get comments. Fascinating comments!


 

Ah, faith. It makes the heart warm.

The Blessed Atheist Bible Study received a comment the other night. As its subject is so relevant to this Blog I feel talking about it here is warranted. It’s in response to a post I wrote back in May regarding the death of my best friend three years ago. You can find that post here along with the comment in question.  Now mind you, I am fully aware Mr. Davis means well so I am reluctant to take him to task here, but I also feel strongly that something needs to be said. In light of that, I have edited his name and email as to allow him some privacy but as for the content, that became public domain in a public forum. I’m trying not to be a jackass here, but I find that Mr. Davis’ rational for God is the very root of many of our problems in this world. It’s an illogical line of thought based on only a couple of assumptions. But these assumptions are massive and must be addressed. The 800 pound gorilla in the room needs an ass-whooping!

 

Please note that I tried to quote only the relevant parts to the comment, but as it’s a long and very entwined account and response, I felt it necessary to just throw the entire thing up and let you judge for yourselves. There seemed no way of untangling the various lines of thought.  Sorry.

Hello. I am terribly sorry that you experienced this; but I also realize how empty my words may sound to you, so I won’t take too much time trying to console you. Just know that I am empathetic.

I want to impose a question. You know what you have been told about God, that He is omnipotent, omnipresent and righteous. Do you understand the full implications of having the power to do anything, knowing how everything was and how EVERYTHING is? Do you know how to think of everyone, in everything everywhere and love it all? I have prejudices, and I’m not talking about race. So simple as thinking that people who believe pro-choice is a good thing are ultimately motivated by hate. So I can tell you that I cannot fully understand His being. But I don’t want an answer to that question, because the answer is negligible.

You may think something like, “how can a god with all of these highly exalted attributes allow suffering like this?” Before I impose the question of concern, let me validate the empathy that I spoke of earlier. When I was seven my aunt died. She was married to a wealthy man and didn’t have to work, when my mom did. During the summer I stayed with my 2nd cousin and my aunt a lot. She was like a second mother and my cousin even still like a brother. My feelings regarding why are no where near my cousin’s, who has OD’d 4 times, 2 of which his body did shut down and he was revived. Why was this allowed?

At thirteen my dad was hit by a drunk driver leaving Stennis Space center. It took him out of work, destroyed my family, medicine ruined his marriage to my mother, and he went out of town with another woman ON my 18th birthday. I sure would like to see the puzzle completed!

When I was 20 I had an excellent job. I was saved when I was 12, just eight months before my father had his wreck. After that happened I kind of let loose. Done some things I’m not proud of, but like you, I regret nothing. It has made me who I am now. Well, I took the job in spite of feeling like I needed to move somewhere else. By the way, these feelings are the Spirit giving guidance, but realize that the devil is best at fooling us using “feelings”. It’s one of the best tools he’s got. However, because I am saved and I do have a personal relationship with the Lord, regardless of the sin I committed in the past, I can discern good and evil. Most of the time when it is selfish, it is evil. But I digress.

I was working this job and one night in 05 I was driving home. That’s it. I could tell you what I have learned about the event, but let me just say that I don’t remember 2 months of my life. I broke my neck. I woke up with screws in my skull. While I was in the coma the staff told my family that I would need to learn how to read, write, walk and talk again. Through God’s grace and the power of prayer, I woke up, freaked out and shoved my father down trying to get out of there. I signed myself out. But why did this happen?

Now comes the questions. Why did God let me through my party phase practically unscathed? I had been bragging about not breaking a bone not a month before the wreck. Well that was foolish. I was in a good job, doing well, tithing like I thought I should.
And why did God let my dad smoke weed and escape time with his family because of pain from his sister dieing? Why wasn’t something done at that time instead of when he started going back to church and doing good?
And why did God let the sorry punk who killed my aunt get out of town free of charge? There seems to be so many other ways that God could have done these things.

That’s enough for now, and I want to respond to this section now before we move on to the rest. Although I am a bit confused as to what exactly happened, it’s obvious that this man has suffered greatly in life. I sympathize. I truly do. I know that I may have given some readers the impression that I am a cold-hearted bastard.  In fact, all my readers likely assume that readily.  People who don’t like the questions I ask or the mocking way in which I ask them are likely to check the Asshole and Heartless boxes on my personality evaluation and leave it at that.  Trust me; I understand.  Though the Asshole designation is pretty much spot on, just ask my parents, the Heartless one isn’t.  For a lack of God, I cry at movie trailers!

Let me tell you, the pain this man suffered kept me awake last night.  I lay awake imagining what I would be like after enduring the prolonged agony such a life endured. Conclusions were slow in the coming right along with sleep, and to my disappointment those conclusions weren’t deep or epiphany-like.  As usual, they were just another work-a-day look at life, but a good look.  Though admittedly incomplete, this is what I’ve come up with so far

Would I be different person were I to suffer as he did? Absolutely! We, as humans, are the sum of our genetics and experiences, and as such, you cannot change either of them and not come out with a radically different person in the end.  This is a given.  Would I have found solace in God and have turned to faith for my answers?  Now this is a different question altogether.  What if’s are questions that cannot be answered with any degree of accuracy.  We indulge these wisps of fantasy constantly throughout every part of our lives from politics to work, and they seem to be a necessary part of the learning process.  They are thought experiments more than anything else, and I can, with intellectual and emotional honesty say no. I still would not believe. To the contrary, I think things like this would have driven me from the imagined arms of  a vengeful God earlier and faster. I’ve read this comment through four times and every single time I shudder. After suffering these many tragedies, I cannot understand how someone can ever see the hand of a kind and loving God here. A wrathful petty deity is much more consistent with the evidence given.  But even that takes a back-o-the-bus seat to the real answer, chance.  This is pure random chance at its most basic level, combined with an evolved level of selfishness. That’s it. The selfishness of humanity accentuating random events that happen all the time.  Sometimes, you get hit by the car.  Sometimes, you don’t.

Giving any kind of credence to feelings produce by a “Devil” and to those given by “The Spirit” is nothing more than superstition. Feelings and emotions are simply evolved survival responses. They do not come from devils or spirits just like they don’t come from Odin, Shiva, our sacred ancestors or some impersonal pyramid-shaped creator force. They are your brain reacting to its environment both in the short term,”Get the hell out of the way of the bus,” and the long term, “would another job/car/girlfriend make me happier.” While I’m sure those sudden morning erections do seem less than divinely inspired, it’s generally these longer term emotions that Mr. Davis is assuming are from both the Devil and God.

How do you respond to the idea of an omnipotent God and a wily Devil battling through your emotional and rational brain by sending vague feelings and desires? Hmmm?? Would the highly technical term “bullshit” work? God won’t come down and talk to you like a sentient being but will send vague and watery “Feelings” to guide you? But Satan also sends “Feelings” virtually indistinguishable from his rival’s with the intention of leading you astray. WTF??  Really?  This is the fucking communication system that an omnipotent being comes up with to guide his designed-by-perfection-yet-vastly-inferior adored creations? How far up your ass must your head be to see any logic in this?

When I pass by an incredibly attractive woman and experience signs of attraction (we’ll just leave it at that, OK?), these are not the Devil’s latest salvo in some ancient supernatural combat. They are symptoms of an even more ancient evolutionary need to get my genetic material spread through the future generations. I’ve said this before and I’m sure I’ll say it again, evolution fully supports a moral basis for life. We are stronger as a group that sticks together rather than one that kills each other. That said, it doesn’t support perfect morality. In the real world, cheating can get you ahead, substantially in some cases. Considering the financial debacle of the last few years, can anyone actually doubt this? We are just, loving, caring but innately selfish beings whose primary goal is sowing our seeds into the next generation.  It’s all about sex, baby, just sex.  We rise above that, sometimes, but this remains our basic programming. It’s the default position. This inevitable selfishness conflicts constantly with our desire for a better world, our instinct to support each other.  Evolution with all its often contradictory morality explains why the world is as screwed up as it is. The idea of an omnipotent, omniscient and omni-loving God, does not.  Perfection and reality are not compatible.

In addition, Mr. Davis’ second paragraph is strongly reminiscent of other arguments we have had here. That is we can’t possibly understand the mind of a perfect and loving God, therefore he is above our ability to judge. In the course of criticizing God’s lack of basic decency and love in other posts, I have been told that true and pure love cannot be comprehended, and that I can’t possibly know what it is. Although, this is likely true, I cannot grok perfect love, I am fully capable of understanding what it isn’t. While I may not be able to understand every nuance and characteristic in perfectly pure iron, I can reasonable assume it’s not like paper.  It’s not wood.  And it certainly isn’t dog shit.    Love does not include torture, slaughter and cruelty. It’s disingenuous to use the idea of incomprehensible perfection to justify all the atrocity we see both in the Bible and on a day to day basis. This is a rationalization of the impossible. This is swallowing the blue pill!

Let’s continue to his next point.

Now let me ask the question that no one wants to pay attention to. Why doesn’t God just let us all suffer in hell than sending HIS OWN SON to hang on a tree to save us? If we want evil to stop, where do we ask God to stop it? Do we stop it a murder? Abuse? Disease? Getting drunk and acting a fool? Lieing? Or do we get him to get the root of the problem: thinking? If we want God to destroy these things in this world we have to ask Him to destroy us, cuz we are the source of the problems. It’s our choice to sin. Did sin cause that disease? I don’t know, maybe a chemical someone was testing at some time did, but why was it tested? Sin probably!

Ok. Wow! Umm… I’m not really sure where we should start on this one. It’s like a bag of live eels, lots of slippery little bastards all entangled together and all of them highly unpleasant.

Here we come to those assumptions I referred to. First, Mr. Davis is asking the wrong questions here. It’s not that we don’t ask the question. It’s that the entire line of question is based on bullshit. The question is not “Why did God send his only begotten son to die for our sins?” That question is completely voided by simply digging deeper than the thin veneer Christians wrap around this question for protection. Even if we assume it’s all true (which we don’t), the real question that all theists must ask themselves is why in hell did a supposed omnipotent deity use this convoluted and illogical system for the redemption of a species that he omnipotently and perfectly(??) created.  Of all the godforsaken ways of going about it, this one is an absolute late-term abortion of logic.

Jesus died for our sins? Why? How the hell was that necessary? When you are strong enough to make the rules why make them as shit-assed crazy as this?  If one has infinite power, why claim one’s going to bend over and take it up the poop chute to save everybody unless… unless one likes/wants it that way.  Hey, to each his own but honestly ask yourself: What kind of nutless buttplug designs a system where he has to torture himself to death to save everyone else from the behaviors he designed into them?  I’m shoving my head up there as far as I can, and it still ain’t working… And goddamn it!  Someone sure made a mess in here!

In addition, Mr. Davis claims that thinking is the root of all evil. (I paraphrase here. Truly, I’m not really sure what he’s saying but this is my best guess.) Now, I freely admit that poor thinking leads directly to poor decisions and hence to suffering.  Oh, but how many times in my youth did I think that one more beer was a fine idea.  But poor thinking habits hardly explain disease for a-lack-of-Christ’s-sake, not to mention earthquakes, tornados, hurricanes and erectile disfunction. Not that I suffer from the last. I’m just saying.

And Mr. Davis, if we are the source of all the problems, isn’t God the source of us?

I won’t even bother responding to the Chemical testing causing disease inference. Shit! How can I respond?   All the words make sense until you put them together. It’s like it’s in code.

Man was given kingdom authority at creation. No we didn’t evolve to the top, God set us up there because He wants the best for us. When Adam and Eve ate of the tree they handed the serpent, the devil, the rights to kingdom authority. The devil is roaming the earth, seeking whom he may devour. The worst thing we can do is BLAME God for what humans set in motion. And if you can’t perceive these things as truth it is because the devil has hardened your heart to the truth, not because you have gained intelligence that brings you past the thought.

God want’s the best for us.  Hmm! Nice fantasy, but I’m unsure how that relates to world I live in, that is the real one. Hell, I don’t even know where he finds that in the Bible, but… OK!  And again he hammers on the idea that God and the devil are locked in combat over the state of our souls. If God is so powerful, why doesn’t he just crush the fiery little piss-ant? It must be that testing thing. You know, God places obstacles in our path to see how we fare, to weed out the chaff of humanity. But AGAIN, if he is perfect and omniscient and created us, there is no need of a test. He knows who will fail and who will succeed.

Now get this, God makes his “Kingdom” so fragile that all it takes to bring it down is a single before-dinner snack. Now that’s a piss-poor architect if I may say so. And to think there are hordes of people begging to get back into his kingdom for all eternity.  C’mon, how long will it be before someone gets the munchies and brings the entire house of imaginary cards down again.

Please understand, I fully agree that one of the worst things we can do is to blame god for our problems. In fact, I’d rank it about third in the dumb-assed pantheon of activities, right behind giving him credit for anything and actually thinking that praying to his make-believe ass accomplishes a goddamned thing. Pardon the pun.

This brings me to one of those thing that Fundamentalists say that drive me insane. If you doubt/question/deny the teachings/morality/existence of God then the devil has control over you, has hardened your heart, so to speak. What a crock! “I don’t believe in God.” “Oh, the devil’s got ahold of you but good son!” Every time this is said, the speaker acts as if he can really see the red bastard clinging to my back goading me with some big-assed spurs. So what do you say to this? “Yeah, that may be true, but Zeus has had an eye on your cute little ass for quite a while!”,or “Well, don’t just stand there buttercup, sacrifice a virgin and ring the sacred bells to scare that shithead off me!”

Buddy, if I can’t perceive the “truth” as you see it, the reason lies with my open eyes and mind, not with some little red-headed step-child of a demon pissing into my left ventricle.  You use this idea as a shield against logic.  See how far that’ll get you.

I am working on my second Master’s degree now. Five years after it was thought that I wouldn’t have any basic motor skills due to brain damage. As far as a plan, you will never figure it out. I will never figure it out. I do know that it is centered around love. He loves you, he loves Blake. You read right, and no it’s not error. I don’t know what Blake’s response to the love of Christ was, but regardless he still loves him. God’s goal doesn’t include pain for anyone. I hurt every day, but I praise God for getting me away from the negatives that were in my life. I just hate that it took him allowing me to break my neck. I do know that I’m not paralyzed like most people who have spinal injuries. God doesn’t give us more than we can handle, we just have to realize that if we are in His will we can handle anything, if you don’t mind another cliche (French=expression) as you will probably call the verite (French=truth) in this.

No, we will not figure out a plan. I couldn’t agree more. This is not because it’s complicated or secret or in some frakking cipher. The facts all line up to the conclusion that a divine plan simply doesn’t exist. To see this all you have to do is open your eyes… and of course, pull your head out of your bung hole.  The first is easy.  The second’s going to hurt a bit.

As for God’s goal not including pain for anyone… Hmm… Does anyone else here see the odd discrepancy between a God who hates pain and one who sends a majority of his creations to hell? Oh, I know the argument. God doesn’t send people to hell. By sinning, they send themselves. Oh for Jesus Christ on a piece of toast! We sentence ourselves by not living up to his expectations? We send ourselves to a tortuous existence by demanding a life path other that slavery? We send ourselves to hell by living free, decent and caring lives? Apparently, God is a fucktard!

Oh, how many times have I heard that last expression. “God doesn’t give us more than we can handle.” That in mind Mr. Davis, tell why the world is littered with the husks of broken humanity? Why are there old men sitting alone on park benches shattered by the loss of their spouse? Why are there children raped or molested and left mentally torn the rest of their lives? How is it that people die slow and terrible deaths in such a variety of ways? Wasn’t that more than they could handle? Wasn’t this too goddamned much! Mr. Davis, how many Jobs broke under the testing.  How many  just weren’t strong enough to handle the punishment your God dishes out while calling it love?

What you really mean to say here Mr. Davis is that if you love unconditionally and without reservations and convince yourself that there is a mysterious and incomprehensible plan then you can swallow the shit burger life randomly deals to its participants. And to be honest, I don’t necessarily disagree. An active fantasy life can increase morale dramatically. In times of stress, imagination can certainly ease you over the rough stretches. But none of this, even in the slightest, increases the likelihood of the concept. Just because these little fairy tales help you deal with life on a day to day basis in no way proves or even hints at its truthfulness.

I just wonder how many people have been trapped in burning houses or buried in earthquake shattered buildings and kept up that fantasy to the end. As the fire gets closer or the bricks and stones press harder, does the fantasy help?

As your rapists continue their work after you prayed to your God to make it across that dark parking lot, does your “belief” offer you any consolation? Is the pain and humiliation less?  Does belief in God ease the suffering?

I doubt it. I really do.  The newspaper gives evidence to the contrary every day.

A Variety of Topics


I have been wanting to mention a few things for a while but due to the sheer volume of life combined with apathy, I simply haven’t gotten around to it yet.  Alas, procrastination is an art that one can only practice so far.  Eventually we must step forth.  Arggg!

First on the agenda is a few new comics and a video on my son’s Skepticomic page.  He comes and goes with pet projects.  He’ll be off making movies or writing scripts for plays and not draw comics for a couple of months and then suddenly crank a few out in a day.  These are not much science or skeptically based, but they are firmly rooted in a twelve-year-old-boy’s view of life.  If any of you don’t know what that is, it may be quite a shock so I apologize in advance.  The movie is embedded here from YouTube and I’m sure he would appreciate a few comments. If you hit the Youtube icon in the corner of the video, it will go to a bigger version there and you’ll be able to leave a comment.  Make his day.

The second thing I wanted to talk about were some of my new favorite sites on the net.  Several readers will recognize them, especially as they are the authors.  Sometimes excellent sites just get overlooked for a while.  These are good, interesting and funny sites deserving of mention here and elsewhere.  Most importantly, they offer a view of life that I find new and refreshing not only from different walks of life but often from different continents altogether.

First is the Dixie Flatline.  Now any reader of this site will be familiar with the site’s author, Daz, a frequent commenter here.  Daz offers a dollop of English sensibilities, albeit radical ones, mixed with a healthy dose of humor, science and science fiction.  Like his comments here, his writings there are pithy, pointed and often stabbingly funny.  He has a way of turning a phrase into comic perfection.  He also has a nose for finding stuff on the net that are brilliantly funny.   In addition, I have ever seen anyone else except myself combine their view of a skeptically based world and the reading of SciFi.  If any of you out there think the science fiction is a useless pastime, Daz and I would disagree, strongly.  It was my first look at an atheistic mindset.  It opened doors that have never shut.   Daz’s site is worth checking out.

It’s funny how the commenters on this site have started to become more like a family than a group of widely separated individuals.  I have begun to care deeply about what they think and how they are doing.  They are the non-nuclear family I wish I’d had growing up.  And I say this with little idea of who they are and what they look like outside of their writings.   Daz is hilarious and his heart is in the right place as is Amy, the Yokohamamama.  Amy’s writings here are often crystal clear and enlightening.  She has an ability to say things with a clarity I truly envy.  Daz and I’ll be arguing with a theist and Amy will politely but firmly give her opinion in a way that makes me think, “Damn it!  Why didn’t I say that!”  Or more accurately, “Why didn’t I say it like that!”  While I’m trying to sort out the metaphoric thumbs of my mind she slices through to the core.

Amy’s site is a view of American mother living in Japan.  Her posts are cute, insightful and well-written, ranging anywhere from Manglish, mangled Japanese to English translations, to life in Yokohama and the beauty of the world around her.  She makes the mundane beautiful.  BTW,  she is also the author of the Book review Doubt: a History on this very site.

Truly, Amy and Daz are Gems, the kind of people you wish were around you constantly.  They have and, hopefully, will continue to broaden and enlighten me, make me more of a Blessed Atheist.  Someday, we will have to meet in person.  A few beers and the hours of  joyful conversation would be wonderful.  Someday.  Right after I win the lottery… that’d be some indefinite time after I bought my first ticket.  Back to that bank robbery thing…

Lastly is Textuality by Larry Tanner.  Mr. Tanner is a brilliant writer covering life from a Jewish/Atheistic point, again another viewpoint I am unfamiliar with.  He is a refreshing blast and his post deserve more attention.  The blog’s topics range mightily over fields stretching from science to poetry and nearly everything in between.  I suggest you read several posts together to get a true taste of the literary flavor there because, like myself, Mr. Tanner’s topics often cover several posts and can get quite involved.   I love how one will be an atheist finding the meaning of life and  next will be on Whitman’s “Leaves of Grass.”  Eclectically perfect.

The Ten Commandments. No Ass Coveting and Few Others.


Right here, God says you're a jackass!

As we all remember in our last episode, we covered the four God commandments. You know the ones that instructed humanity what not to do against God, those terrible sins by which you, personally, can hurt the feelings of the Lord of the Universe, the prince of peace, the big guy himself. Unfortunately, as my readers know, I simply couldn’t answer the riddle of how anything we did, anything at all, would ever be of harm to an omnipotent deity.  We are like yeast cells to him and ask yourself, has yeast ever really made you mad or made you cry?  Ever??

I suspect the answer to God’s hurt feelings just doesn’t exist and like all the other puzzles of similar ilk lying within these pages, theists will insist we file it under the “Mysterious Ways” heading and never look directly at it again. If we don’t think about it, it won’t bother us. See no evil.  Hear no evil. Speak no evil. Well, I’m a speakin’!  Ignorance isn’t bliss; it’s just goddamned ignorant.  Is that really what we are striving for here?  I think not, my little buttercups!  It’s my philosophy to pull all the assorted trash out of the closet and see what trite little trinkets it  really consists of. Speaking personally on those first four commandments, I’ve gotten better advice off  gum wrappers. And Simpson episodes? They are veritable tomes of human wisdom.  The Lord my God in-frakking-deed!

But this episode, boys and girls, isn’t about those God Commandments. It’s about the human ones, five through ten, the back of the bus regulations. These are the laws meant to protect us from ourselves or, to be more accurate, each other. Now again, let’s take the Christian argument that the Ten Commandments are the very basis of our legal system today. Well, obviously the first four have nothing to do with any recognizable legal framework at work in America today, but the Fundamentalists could argue that our system with its vast number and variety of laws, restrictions and regulations is based innately on the next six. We’re going to do an in-depth check on that little fallacy right now.

By the way, I in no way mean to imply that any fundamentalist would ever consider those first four to be unimportant. Obviously, they would place respect for their bloody-handed God at the very top of their rigid pyramid of order, far above any respect for those things merely human in origin or, for that matter, those mere humans themselves. History is chock full of Christians massacring those who didn’t worship their God, who worshipped their God in a differing manner and those who worshipped their God in nearly identical ways but who owned a lot of cool shit that the first Christians wanted. If you hold your God first, ordinary people matter little.

In human affairs, the first commandment really should have been greed. The rest you could have just made up as you went along. Much like they did.

Onward you non-Christian soldiers for there are people to enlighten.

We start with commandment five: Honor your father and your mother, that your days may be prolonged in the land which the Lord your God gives you.

Most of us who grew up with this directive have placed it in the background and never really thought about it. Of course you’re supposed to honor your father and mother. Duh! But after doing quite a bit of reading and thinking on this, my opinion has metamorphosed some. This is likely to be the most socially progressive commandment of the ten. The original intent here was not to insist on respect of people who may not even deserve it. It was an edict demanding that you take care of your parents even when they have become old and no longer economically useful, a kind of mandated and wholly privatized social security system. If everyone takes care of their own, there will be less poverty, starvation and misery. The logic for a primitive society is hard to argue with.

Overall, I’d have to give this commandment a thumbs up. In the interests of truth, however, I also have to point out that I do not get along well with my own parents. As any long time reader of this blog is aware, my atheism has strained our relationship to the breaking point. I believe I’m out of the will completely by now and when they find out about the Blessed Atheist Bible Study, it’ll be over for sure. So ironically, the one commandment I respect the most is the one I seem unable to follow. Damn my blackened and withered soul!

The next commandment is too important to be anything but the climax of my case so I’m going to skip number six for now and plunge into seven: You shall not commit adultery.

Ooooh!  Well, we do see this mating jealousy even in the animal kingdom, monogamous marriage, driving away potential rivals and the like. This whole concept is a veritable foundation of evolution for we want our genes passed down, ours alone, not the genes of slick talkin’ Leisure Suit Larry over there. But at the same time if we can slip one in on the side and get Jim-Bob there to raise one of our kids as his own… Well, you can’t deny it happens and evolutionarily it’s still our genes.

It’s morally reprehensible but common. Evolution certainly favors an ethics system but hardly a perfect one. It uses a game theory of life: that which will get us ahead will be favored but not to the exclusion of other strategies. Evolution and ourselves are always hedging our bets. Both cheating and loyalty have some success.  However, civilization is also dependent on stepping away from our animal instincts and forming something a bit higher, a new moral zeitgeist so to speak. We need to rise above thinking with our groins.  Will this be successful? I’ll have to get back to you on that, but I’m pretty sure a moderate level of adultery will ensue well into the future no matter how high we rise.

Just to be clear here. I don’t favor adultery and have never even cheated on a girlfriend let alone my wife, ever, and seriously frown upon those who do. Nonetheless, I am quite aware of humanity’s foibles.  Of course, if you use that old Fundy chestnut that if you have lusted in your heart then you have committed adultery then I’ve sinned on a daily basis.  Though in my most humble opinion, what’s lusted in the heart stays in the heart.  If they want to worship some kind of omniscient peeping tom, that’s up to them, but the sum-bitch gives me the creeps.

Eight: You shall not steal.

This one like the prohibition against adultery is obvious but hardly overwhelming. Killing and stealing and taking women as concubines from any outside group is not just frequently allowed but, at times, encouraged or even mandated. Doubt this? Read Samuel 15 and the God commanded Genocide of the Amalekites. Remember them? Or Deuteronomy 21, 10-14, the official guide on how to take conquered women as sex slaves. But those tidbits lie in the future.

Stealing, like adultery, causes conflict and hard feelings. Societies can only endure so much of these before collapsing and to reduce friction between men, families and clans, rules such as these are put in place. Don’t sleep with my wife. Don’t steal my shit.  Any questions? Are there actually societies where these “crimes” are encouraged? They wouldn’t be societies for long. This is a given.

I’m also apologize about the male centeredness of this post but these dealt primarily with men. There wasn’t anything about coveting husbands so ladies… have at it.  Just not his ass!  But that’s later.

Nine: You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.

Don’t lie. Don’t say your neighbor did something he didn’t. Same as before, this one is a conflict preventer within a small tribe, but a paradigm shift in jurisprudence, it is not. Were the Hebrews lying bastards before this commandment? Not likely! Like all the other people on earth, they told enough truth to keep the tribe together, but also like every other society, I’m sure fibs and fictions weren’t unknown, just discouraged. Hell, just look at the whoppers Moses told. Burning bush, my ass.

Ten, the coveting ban: You shall not covet your neighbor’s house; you shall not covet your neighbor’s wife or his male servant or his female servant or his ox or his donkey (ass) or anything that belongs to your neighbor.”

A prohibition against envy and jealousy while potentially admirable, is hardly the foundation of Christianity-dominated capitalism rampant throughout the western world today. Isn’t the very basis of our consumer culture that we want what our neighbors have, or even better, what they don’t have… yet? Isn’t every ad campaign centered on creating covetousness in its targets? You want this (insert product here). Yeah, Baby! You know you do! C’mon people! We live amongst the most covetous population that has ever existed and who are predominately Christian, yet here is one of the commandments strictly prohibiting what our entire world is based on.  WTF!

We have Sarah Palin @ www.dumbbitch.com (Sorry ladies, I couldn’t resist) trumpeting the importance of the Ten Commandments and then swearing she will restart our covetous-rooted economy better than the other guys. Does anyone else see the bullshit laced throughout her and other’s arguments? Are not these opposite and contradictory goals? Has she even read these things? For that matter, can she even read? Hmm?  The world does wonder.  But who the hell needs to read when you’re so damned cute?

Rants against coveting smack of the Buddhist ideals of giving up greed and desire, and I have to reject this entire notion completely. not that’s it’s been twisted into violence the way that so many other beliefs have, but still. The very essence of humanity is to desire, and, may I say, covet. We work very hard to achieve that which we covet whether it be a toaster from Walmart or the Grand Unified Theory of Everything, the love of our wife or the look of our children. Many things can be beautif to covet.  It is these desires that have driven our society upwards to better places, and coveting and desire in moderation are essential to our happiness. Giving up my desires and lusts and… covetations (is that a word?) is equivalent to surrendering my emotions. I’m not bloodly likely to do either, but I’m just as bloody unlikely to surrender completely to them. Moderation!

These flaws make us human and I’m unwilling to become something else at this point.  Not that I’m in any position to choose right now… Even so!

Now to return to the big one, Commandment number six: You shall not murder.

Well, goddamn it anyway! I was just getting the rifle out too. Now my afternoon is pretty much screwed! I jest, of course, the rifle’s in the shop, but they gave me this beautiful machete as a loaner, though. More work but the exercise would do me good.

Now, in no way am I ever insinuating that this restriction is not a good and necessary part of legal jurisprudence. In truth, I wish we as a species followed this particular statute more closely. But! But! BUT! Let’s assume this entire fairy tale is true and God came down and handed out the Commandments just as written. It’s not like that law wasn’t already in place in every society on earth. It’s hardly an epiphany, people!

Holy Shit, Jim-Bob! You better put down that bloody-knife and read this! No! No! No! Stop chasing that neighbor boy. The little bastard’s off-limits now!

Thou shall not murder has been on our books long before there were actual books. It’d be quite difficult to build any kind of society in which members killed other members indiscriminately. One of the absolute, most-fundamental prerequisites of civilization is not to kill each other. Think about it! How long would a tribe last if the hunting parties sent out in the morning came back at half strength in the evening? And those survivors returned munching on the human remains of their brothers! We’d not only be uncivilized: we’d be extinct. Even with an intelligence far beyond ours, a species who commonly murders their own relatives would never advance beyond living in trees and killing each other with coconuts. It simply can’t happen!

I’m not saying that the world can’t survive a little killing. It has and does. We’re resilient to say the least. It’s who gets killed that is most important. We seldom kill those who we regard as “Us” but regularly slaughter those we see as “Them”. Christians are forever hedging on the differences between murder and killing, but how else could a Christian ever support war or capital punishment of any kind? How could you have ever justified the mass slaughter of the infidels, so common through out all history, holding high a restriction on killing anyone? The difference between killing and murder is determined on where you draw the “Us” and “Them” line.  It’s unthinkable to harm an “Us”, but a “Them”?  Well…

In no way, shape or form am I implying that Christians are the only one who have done this. All humanity engages in this type of judgement constantly. We having varying degrees of both “Us” and “Them” and it can change on a daily basis. Islamic radicals blow up the World Trade Center and the whole Muslim religion slips further into “Them”. Certain nations helped us in our War on Terror and they slide closer to “Us”. This constantly shifting perspective lies both on a personal and a societal scale. Our societal consensus of who we see as “Them” is merely the cumulative total of all our personal scales.

If someone is kind they move closer to “Us”. If someone is mean or rude or cruel, they rapidly slide into “Them” As they go further from “Us”, it becomes increasingly easy to commit acts of aggression or violence against them. When a 6 feet 4 inch 240 lb. male breaks into our house at 2:30 a.m., they instantly slam to the far right side of “Them” allowing us to react in whatever way is necessary to protect our family. But at the same time, it has been difficult historically to add people to the “Us” group who are a different color, or who act, sound or seem different. It’s our nature to view differences as suspicious and “Them”. We don’t learn to be racist.  We learn not to be!

We must always keep in mind that in spite of our bloody human nature, we need not be ruled by its dictates alone. We can progress, and the progress of civilization can be measured directly by the number of people we willingly place in the “Us” group. All of history could be viewed in these terms. As “Us” groups grow in size, civilization rises. As they shrink, societal progress reverses and we enter a “Dark Age”. One only need look at the rise and fall of the Roman Empire or any other empire or nation to see the truth in this. The very peak of civilization would be for us as a whole to consider everyone “Us”.

Where the hell am I going with this, you ask…? Uh…? Sometimes I do have to wonder myself, but I think this sums up the sixth commandment best. The ancient Hebrews viewed this not as a rigid commandment not to kill anyone, only as a rule to not kill other Hebrews. As with any people on earth, they killed plenty of others, vast nations of others, really. They put their victims into  the “Them” category. In their defense, there are very few groups of people surviving today who have not done similar atrocities. It’s the reason they have survived. A little cussed meanness has been a benefit evolutionarily.  The meek?  Those poor bastards will never inherit the earth, and whoever thought they would is an idiot. Sorry Jesus, but the truth must be said.  Without some serious assistance from the strong, the meek are going to have their asses kicked and be buried in forgotten unmarked mass graves… just like they always have been.

I know this is off topic, but I feel strongly here. You ever wonder how a religion based on peace survived all these centuries? You ever wonder why Christians don’t just throw out the Old Testament altogether? These are intricately linked questions. Christianity has survived because at its core is a message of peace to draw people into the “Us” camp, but at the same time it retained the terrible potential and rational for violence contained in the Old Testament. This dual and at times contradictory purposes gave it both the carrot and the stick. Draw some in with the love of the New and smack down those who stand against “Us” with the Yahweh of the Old. Between these two poles lie an unlimited range of action, a supreme flexibility. There is little that lay outside of these parameters for nearly anything can be justified. With this adaptability, it’s no wonder they’ve been around so long.

But strong doesn’t always mean right.

In the world today, our “Us” has grown greatly the last century but I’m not sure we have it in us to go the distance. It seems to me that the fundamentalist ideology, whether Muslim or Christian, stands in our way. They are separators rather than gatherers, destroyers rather than glue. Look at how their churches continue to fragment over such “contentious”  (bullshit! (Oops! Did I say that out loud?)) issues as whether to allow gays to serve in clergy or to even be part of the church at all. Look at how Christian fundamentalists have used immigration, gay marriage and the war on terror to divide, not only our nation, but the world. Look at how fundamentalist Muslims have used terror and murder to achieve the same goal. They use hate and fear to divide, and it’s working.

We may be entering a dark age again.
It scares the shit out of me!
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 44 other followers