Oh, do I get comments. Fascinating comments!

 

Ah, faith. It makes the heart warm.

The Blessed Atheist Bible Study received a comment the other night. As its subject is so relevant to this Blog I feel talking about it here is warranted. It’s in response to a post I wrote back in May regarding the death of my best friend three years ago. You can find that post here along with the comment in question.  Now mind you, I am fully aware Mr. Davis means well so I am reluctant to take him to task here, but I also feel strongly that something needs to be said. In light of that, I have edited his name and email as to allow him some privacy but as for the content, that became public domain in a public forum. I’m trying not to be a jackass here, but I find that Mr. Davis’ rational for God is the very root of many of our problems in this world. It’s an illogical line of thought based on only a couple of assumptions. But these assumptions are massive and must be addressed. The 800 pound gorilla in the room needs an ass-whooping!

 

Please note that I tried to quote only the relevant parts to the comment, but as it’s a long and very entwined account and response, I felt it necessary to just throw the entire thing up and let you judge for yourselves. There seemed no way of untangling the various lines of thought.  Sorry.

Hello. I am terribly sorry that you experienced this; but I also realize how empty my words may sound to you, so I won’t take too much time trying to console you. Just know that I am empathetic.

I want to impose a question. You know what you have been told about God, that He is omnipotent, omnipresent and righteous. Do you understand the full implications of having the power to do anything, knowing how everything was and how EVERYTHING is? Do you know how to think of everyone, in everything everywhere and love it all? I have prejudices, and I’m not talking about race. So simple as thinking that people who believe pro-choice is a good thing are ultimately motivated by hate. So I can tell you that I cannot fully understand His being. But I don’t want an answer to that question, because the answer is negligible.

You may think something like, “how can a god with all of these highly exalted attributes allow suffering like this?” Before I impose the question of concern, let me validate the empathy that I spoke of earlier. When I was seven my aunt died. She was married to a wealthy man and didn’t have to work, when my mom did. During the summer I stayed with my 2nd cousin and my aunt a lot. She was like a second mother and my cousin even still like a brother. My feelings regarding why are no where near my cousin’s, who has OD’d 4 times, 2 of which his body did shut down and he was revived. Why was this allowed?

At thirteen my dad was hit by a drunk driver leaving Stennis Space center. It took him out of work, destroyed my family, medicine ruined his marriage to my mother, and he went out of town with another woman ON my 18th birthday. I sure would like to see the puzzle completed!

When I was 20 I had an excellent job. I was saved when I was 12, just eight months before my father had his wreck. After that happened I kind of let loose. Done some things I’m not proud of, but like you, I regret nothing. It has made me who I am now. Well, I took the job in spite of feeling like I needed to move somewhere else. By the way, these feelings are the Spirit giving guidance, but realize that the devil is best at fooling us using “feelings”. It’s one of the best tools he’s got. However, because I am saved and I do have a personal relationship with the Lord, regardless of the sin I committed in the past, I can discern good and evil. Most of the time when it is selfish, it is evil. But I digress.

I was working this job and one night in 05 I was driving home. That’s it. I could tell you what I have learned about the event, but let me just say that I don’t remember 2 months of my life. I broke my neck. I woke up with screws in my skull. While I was in the coma the staff told my family that I would need to learn how to read, write, walk and talk again. Through God’s grace and the power of prayer, I woke up, freaked out and shoved my father down trying to get out of there. I signed myself out. But why did this happen?

Now comes the questions. Why did God let me through my party phase practically unscathed? I had been bragging about not breaking a bone not a month before the wreck. Well that was foolish. I was in a good job, doing well, tithing like I thought I should.
And why did God let my dad smoke weed and escape time with his family because of pain from his sister dieing? Why wasn’t something done at that time instead of when he started going back to church and doing good?
And why did God let the sorry punk who killed my aunt get out of town free of charge? There seems to be so many other ways that God could have done these things.

That’s enough for now, and I want to respond to this section now before we move on to the rest. Although I am a bit confused as to what exactly happened, it’s obvious that this man has suffered greatly in life. I sympathize. I truly do. I know that I may have given some readers the impression that I am a cold-hearted bastard.  In fact, all my readers likely assume that readily.  People who don’t like the questions I ask or the mocking way in which I ask them are likely to check the Asshole and Heartless boxes on my personality evaluation and leave it at that.  Trust me; I understand.  Though the Asshole designation is pretty much spot on, just ask my parents, the Heartless one isn’t.  For a lack of God, I cry at movie trailers!

Let me tell you, the pain this man suffered kept me awake last night.  I lay awake imagining what I would be like after enduring the prolonged agony such a life endured. Conclusions were slow in the coming right along with sleep, and to my disappointment those conclusions weren’t deep or epiphany-like.  As usual, they were just another work-a-day look at life, but a good look.  Though admittedly incomplete, this is what I’ve come up with so far

Would I be different person were I to suffer as he did? Absolutely! We, as humans, are the sum of our genetics and experiences, and as such, you cannot change either of them and not come out with a radically different person in the end.  This is a given.  Would I have found solace in God and have turned to faith for my answers?  Now this is a different question altogether.  What if’s are questions that cannot be answered with any degree of accuracy.  We indulge these wisps of fantasy constantly throughout every part of our lives from politics to work, and they seem to be a necessary part of the learning process.  They are thought experiments more than anything else, and I can, with intellectual and emotional honesty say no. I still would not believe. To the contrary, I think things like this would have driven me from the imagined arms of  a vengeful God earlier and faster. I’ve read this comment through four times and every single time I shudder. After suffering these many tragedies, I cannot understand how someone can ever see the hand of a kind and loving God here. A wrathful petty deity is much more consistent with the evidence given.  But even that takes a back-o-the-bus seat to the real answer, chance.  This is pure random chance at its most basic level, combined with an evolved level of selfishness. That’s it. The selfishness of humanity accentuating random events that happen all the time.  Sometimes, you get hit by the car.  Sometimes, you don’t.

Giving any kind of credence to feelings produce by a “Devil” and to those given by “The Spirit” is nothing more than superstition. Feelings and emotions are simply evolved survival responses. They do not come from devils or spirits just like they don’t come from Odin, Shiva, our sacred ancestors or some impersonal pyramid-shaped creator force. They are your brain reacting to its environment both in the short term,”Get the hell out of the way of the bus,” and the long term, “would another job/car/girlfriend make me happier.” While I’m sure those sudden morning erections do seem less than divinely inspired, it’s generally these longer term emotions that Mr. Davis is assuming are from both the Devil and God.

How do you respond to the idea of an omnipotent God and a wily Devil battling through your emotional and rational brain by sending vague feelings and desires? Hmmm?? Would the highly technical term “bullshit” work? God won’t come down and talk to you like a sentient being but will send vague and watery “Feelings” to guide you? But Satan also sends “Feelings” virtually indistinguishable from his rival’s with the intention of leading you astray. WTF??  Really?  This is the fucking communication system that an omnipotent being comes up with to guide his designed-by-perfection-yet-vastly-inferior adored creations? How far up your ass must your head be to see any logic in this?

When I pass by an incredibly attractive woman and experience signs of attraction (we’ll just leave it at that, OK?), these are not the Devil’s latest salvo in some ancient supernatural combat. They are symptoms of an even more ancient evolutionary need to get my genetic material spread through the future generations. I’ve said this before and I’m sure I’ll say it again, evolution fully supports a moral basis for life. We are stronger as a group that sticks together rather than one that kills each other. That said, it doesn’t support perfect morality. In the real world, cheating can get you ahead, substantially in some cases. Considering the financial debacle of the last few years, can anyone actually doubt this? We are just, loving, caring but innately selfish beings whose primary goal is sowing our seeds into the next generation.  It’s all about sex, baby, just sex.  We rise above that, sometimes, but this remains our basic programming. It’s the default position. This inevitable selfishness conflicts constantly with our desire for a better world, our instinct to support each other.  Evolution with all its often contradictory morality explains why the world is as screwed up as it is. The idea of an omnipotent, omniscient and omni-loving God, does not.  Perfection and reality are not compatible.

In addition, Mr. Davis’ second paragraph is strongly reminiscent of other arguments we have had here. That is we can’t possibly understand the mind of a perfect and loving God, therefore he is above our ability to judge. In the course of criticizing God’s lack of basic decency and love in other posts, I have been told that true and pure love cannot be comprehended, and that I can’t possibly know what it is. Although, this is likely true, I cannot grok perfect love, I am fully capable of understanding what it isn’t. While I may not be able to understand every nuance and characteristic in perfectly pure iron, I can reasonable assume it’s not like paper.  It’s not wood.  And it certainly isn’t dog shit.    Love does not include torture, slaughter and cruelty. It’s disingenuous to use the idea of incomprehensible perfection to justify all the atrocity we see both in the Bible and on a day to day basis. This is a rationalization of the impossible. This is swallowing the blue pill!

Let’s continue to his next point.

Now let me ask the question that no one wants to pay attention to. Why doesn’t God just let us all suffer in hell than sending HIS OWN SON to hang on a tree to save us? If we want evil to stop, where do we ask God to stop it? Do we stop it a murder? Abuse? Disease? Getting drunk and acting a fool? Lieing? Or do we get him to get the root of the problem: thinking? If we want God to destroy these things in this world we have to ask Him to destroy us, cuz we are the source of the problems. It’s our choice to sin. Did sin cause that disease? I don’t know, maybe a chemical someone was testing at some time did, but why was it tested? Sin probably!

Ok. Wow! Umm… I’m not really sure where we should start on this one. It’s like a bag of live eels, lots of slippery little bastards all entangled together and all of them highly unpleasant.

Here we come to those assumptions I referred to. First, Mr. Davis is asking the wrong questions here. It’s not that we don’t ask the question. It’s that the entire line of question is based on bullshit. The question is not “Why did God send his only begotten son to die for our sins?” That question is completely voided by simply digging deeper than the thin veneer Christians wrap around this question for protection. Even if we assume it’s all true (which we don’t), the real question that all theists must ask themselves is why in hell did a supposed omnipotent deity use this convoluted and illogical system for the redemption of a species that he omnipotently and perfectly(??) created.  Of all the godforsaken ways of going about it, this one is an absolute late-term abortion of logic.

Jesus died for our sins? Why? How the hell was that necessary? When you are strong enough to make the rules why make them as shit-assed crazy as this?  If one has infinite power, why claim one’s going to bend over and take it up the poop chute to save everybody unless… unless one likes/wants it that way.  Hey, to each his own but honestly ask yourself: What kind of nutless buttplug designs a system where he has to torture himself to death to save everyone else from the behaviors he designed into them?  I’m shoving my head up there as far as I can, and it still ain’t working… And goddamn it!  Someone sure made a mess in here!

In addition, Mr. Davis claims that thinking is the root of all evil. (I paraphrase here. Truly, I’m not really sure what he’s saying but this is my best guess.) Now, I freely admit that poor thinking leads directly to poor decisions and hence to suffering.  Oh, but how many times in my youth did I think that one more beer was a fine idea.  But poor thinking habits hardly explain disease for a-lack-of-Christ’s-sake, not to mention earthquakes, tornados, hurricanes and erectile disfunction. Not that I suffer from the last. I’m just saying.

And Mr. Davis, if we are the source of all the problems, isn’t God the source of us?

I won’t even bother responding to the Chemical testing causing disease inference. Shit! How can I respond?   All the words make sense until you put them together. It’s like it’s in code.

Man was given kingdom authority at creation. No we didn’t evolve to the top, God set us up there because He wants the best for us. When Adam and Eve ate of the tree they handed the serpent, the devil, the rights to kingdom authority. The devil is roaming the earth, seeking whom he may devour. The worst thing we can do is BLAME God for what humans set in motion. And if you can’t perceive these things as truth it is because the devil has hardened your heart to the truth, not because you have gained intelligence that brings you past the thought.

God want’s the best for us.  Hmm! Nice fantasy, but I’m unsure how that relates to world I live in, that is the real one. Hell, I don’t even know where he finds that in the Bible, but… OK!  And again he hammers on the idea that God and the devil are locked in combat over the state of our souls. If God is so powerful, why doesn’t he just crush the fiery little piss-ant? It must be that testing thing. You know, God places obstacles in our path to see how we fare, to weed out the chaff of humanity. But AGAIN, if he is perfect and omniscient and created us, there is no need of a test. He knows who will fail and who will succeed.

Now get this, God makes his “Kingdom” so fragile that all it takes to bring it down is a single before-dinner snack. Now that’s a piss-poor architect if I may say so. And to think there are hordes of people begging to get back into his kingdom for all eternity.  C’mon, how long will it be before someone gets the munchies and brings the entire house of imaginary cards down again.

Please understand, I fully agree that one of the worst things we can do is to blame god for our problems. In fact, I’d rank it about third in the dumb-assed pantheon of activities, right behind giving him credit for anything and actually thinking that praying to his make-believe ass accomplishes a goddamned thing. Pardon the pun.

This brings me to one of those thing that Fundamentalists say that drive me insane. If you doubt/question/deny the teachings/morality/existence of God then the devil has control over you, has hardened your heart, so to speak. What a crock! “I don’t believe in God.” “Oh, the devil’s got ahold of you but good son!” Every time this is said, the speaker acts as if he can really see the red bastard clinging to my back goading me with some big-assed spurs. So what do you say to this? “Yeah, that may be true, but Zeus has had an eye on your cute little ass for quite a while!”,or “Well, don’t just stand there buttercup, sacrifice a virgin and ring the sacred bells to scare that shithead off me!”

Buddy, if I can’t perceive the “truth” as you see it, the reason lies with my open eyes and mind, not with some little red-headed step-child of a demon pissing into my left ventricle.  You use this idea as a shield against logic.  See how far that’ll get you.

I am working on my second Master’s degree now. Five years after it was thought that I wouldn’t have any basic motor skills due to brain damage. As far as a plan, you will never figure it out. I will never figure it out. I do know that it is centered around love. He loves you, he loves Blake. You read right, and no it’s not error. I don’t know what Blake’s response to the love of Christ was, but regardless he still loves him. God’s goal doesn’t include pain for anyone. I hurt every day, but I praise God for getting me away from the negatives that were in my life. I just hate that it took him allowing me to break my neck. I do know that I’m not paralyzed like most people who have spinal injuries. God doesn’t give us more than we can handle, we just have to realize that if we are in His will we can handle anything, if you don’t mind another cliche (French=expression) as you will probably call the verite (French=truth) in this.

No, we will not figure out a plan. I couldn’t agree more. This is not because it’s complicated or secret or in some frakking cipher. The facts all line up to the conclusion that a divine plan simply doesn’t exist. To see this all you have to do is open your eyes… and of course, pull your head out of your bung hole.  The first is easy.  The second’s going to hurt a bit.

As for God’s goal not including pain for anyone… Hmm… Does anyone else here see the odd discrepancy between a God who hates pain and one who sends a majority of his creations to hell? Oh, I know the argument. God doesn’t send people to hell. By sinning, they send themselves. Oh for Jesus Christ on a piece of toast! We sentence ourselves by not living up to his expectations? We send ourselves to a tortuous existence by demanding a life path other that slavery? We send ourselves to hell by living free, decent and caring lives? Apparently, God is a fucktard!

Oh, how many times have I heard that last expression. “God doesn’t give us more than we can handle.” That in mind Mr. Davis, tell why the world is littered with the husks of broken humanity? Why are there old men sitting alone on park benches shattered by the loss of their spouse? Why are there children raped or molested and left mentally torn the rest of their lives? How is it that people die slow and terrible deaths in such a variety of ways? Wasn’t that more than they could handle? Wasn’t this too goddamned much! Mr. Davis, how many Jobs broke under the testing.  How many  just weren’t strong enough to handle the punishment your God dishes out while calling it love?

What you really mean to say here Mr. Davis is that if you love unconditionally and without reservations and convince yourself that there is a mysterious and incomprehensible plan then you can swallow the shit burger life randomly deals to its participants. And to be honest, I don’t necessarily disagree. An active fantasy life can increase morale dramatically. In times of stress, imagination can certainly ease you over the rough stretches. But none of this, even in the slightest, increases the likelihood of the concept. Just because these little fairy tales help you deal with life on a day to day basis in no way proves or even hints at its truthfulness.

I just wonder how many people have been trapped in burning houses or buried in earthquake shattered buildings and kept up that fantasy to the end. As the fire gets closer or the bricks and stones press harder, does the fantasy help?

As your rapists continue their work after you prayed to your God to make it across that dark parking lot, does your “belief” offer you any consolation? Is the pain and humiliation less?  Does belief in God ease the suffering?

I doubt it. I really do.  The newspaper gives evidence to the contrary every day.

  1. You know, he almost get there, doesn’t he…

    And why did God let the sorry punk who killed my aunt get out of town free of charge? There seems to be so many other ways that God could have done these things.

    Yes, dear, and the lightning strikes Olympian Zeus’ mountain as often as the open field, doesn’t it? The Lord’s timing must seem almost incomprehensible to us mere mortals–why indeed wait till someone had turned to God to blast them with misfortune. As dear Ben Franklin noted,

    It has pleased God in his Goodness to Mankind, at length to discover to them the Means of Securing their Habitations and other Buildings from Mischief by Thunder and Lightning….

    The Lord do seem to take His own sweet time about things, don’t He?

    (“…late-term abortion of logic…”? I am so stealing that, KK:))

    • You can have that one Amy. I was thinking of you spewing coffee all over your monitor as your read it. My wife nearly did.

  2. So Mr Davis advances his ‘miraculous’ lack of paralysis as evidence of God’s hand. Maybe he should take his thumb off the scales and took into account all those perfectly pious folk who had similar injuries and *didn’t* recover any movement. (Maybe we could name this Chilean Miners’ Syndrome.)

    My Mum broke her spine in a fall several years ago but recovered full movement — though she’s a couple of inches shorter now, as some vertebrae were compacted — but what saved her wasn’t a god, or faith in one. It was a combination of modern science-and-evidence based medical care, and pure blind luck. Maybe If she’d landed slightly differently, or fallen form an inch or two higher, things would have been worse. Like I say — luck.

    Do you see, Mr Davis? I wouldn’t want to belittle your suffering, but you used it as ‘proof’ of your god hypothesis. Don’t you see that it’s possible to draw more than one conclusion from your ‘proof’ of God’s existence and love for us? Therefore it’s useless to bring it into the debate.

    (KK I made a bodge up and posted this anonymously just now, but it seems to have disappeared anyway. Moderation, maybe, as I used some html formatting by habit. Please feel fee to delete the anon. version.)

    • Oh [censored]! Still, it proves html formatting works. *cough*

    • Baconsbud
    • October 22nd, 2010

    I actually stopped reading what you put of his comments as soon as I read what he said about thinking. Once you give up thinking for yourself you have given whoever wants it complete power over yourself. When you look though history you find the worst of humankind is where others allow most thinking to be done by a few people.

    • Exactly. If everyone stops thinking for themselves, someone will take Moses lead and speak for God and lead these well trained slaves somewhere. And history show that it’s generally not a good place.

    • Bob Pendell
    • October 22nd, 2010

    And yet, it seems to me that all the stupidity arises not from some non-existent God, but from the insanity of trying to understand a spiritual text literally (an error that the text itself warns against) and then trying to understand it on the basis of believing it to be history instead of the mythology that it is. The idea of God can be a valuable tool for anyone who understands it as a product of the human imagination and uses it as such. God, in my not so humble opinion, should be an ideal standard against which we can measure our progress through life, not an insane Big Sky Daddy who has everything under control.

    The important realization here is that our ideas of God must be based on human values instead of masochist fantasies of an all-powerful Punisher who will give us what we think we deserve. You are quite right in pointing out the stupidity of such a perverted opinion. If my idea of God did not call for complete rationality and a realization that it’s a myth for me to use to improve my life, it would be as worthless as the idea of God posited by the correspondent in his letter.

    To sum it up, I long ago came up with a simple way to express my understanding of the value of religion (if any):

    Satan is someone we invented to blame for all the bad things that happen to us so we don’t have to take responsibility for them.

    God is someone we invented to blame for all the good things that happen to us so we don’t have to take responsibility for them.

    So, for me, it comes down the understanding that I can use the text of the Bible (or the Quran, or the Dhammapada, or the Iliad) for what it can teach me about the nature of life in this world and how others in the past have responded to that nature and that this is enough to be of help in measuring my progress. I must not, however, ever accept it as a statement of literal truth or factual history–that would be to distort its usefulness into insanity. And thus, I could call myself a Christian atheist without fear of divine retribution or incipient derangement.

    I believe that the value (or otherwise) of the Bible or any other scripture lies in the fact that what we get from it tells us more about who we are than about what life is for and where it all comes from. So I can read and learn from it without sinking into superstition. And in that I find great value.

    With love under will,

    Bob, Adastra,
    The Wizzard of Jacksonville

    • I couldn’t agree more, with the slight change that what you call God, I would call an aspiration to better myself or an ideal to aim at.

      With no criticism intended, I’d be interested to know why you feel you need God in this picture at all. I could rewrite your comment removing any mention of your religious belief, replacing with synonyms for ‘aspirations’, and not change the tone or meaning at all. Care to comment on that?

      That slight disagreement aside, though, a very masterly summing up. Well done sir.

      (Also, why “Wizzard of Jacksonville”? Just curious.}

      • Good morning Daz.
        I don’t know but I understand where he’s coming from. It’s viewing the bible as literature and as literature we can talk about god and Jesus. Think about a discussion of Middle Earth. We know Frodo and Sam aren’t real but we can admire their tenaciousness and ethics and talk about them as people. Literature’s higher purpose is to get us to look at ourselves by giving us fiction we feel as if it were real. The Bible and its fictional God can be seen the same way.

        Viewing it how we view the Iliad or Odyssey or epic of Gilgamesh or Beowulf, one can see truth in it. One can see beauty. Viewing it as literal truth just makes it squalid and cruel and bullshit. Humanity loves to take things that are beautiful and study and add to them until they are ugly.

        My friend who died, Blake, called this white man’s disease. Mainly, he was referring to activities like hiking or bowhunting where the technology has improved so much that it strips the primitive enjoyment from it. People used to bowhunt because it was harder and more challenging and kept them out in the wild longer but along comes great leaps of tech that eventually make it easy again defeating the purpose. And these same people don’t realize what the’ve lost.

      • Good afternoon KK. :-)

        I agree totally. I was asking more out of curiosity than anything. I’d certainly not disagree with the main thrust of what Mr Pendell says. How could I? It’s spot-on.

    • Mr. Pendell:

      I couldn’t agree more. The entire truthfulness of the Bible boils down as to whether you take the Bible as history or as literature. As true and inerrant history, it is no better than the scum in the bottom of the toilet. As literature it can be quite beautiful at times. Like the Iliad, the violence of it can be a bit hard to swallow at times but it shows us which values we call human are unchanging and which ones we have improved on.

      The worst thing you can do is use it as a source of absolute morality. But hey, who in the he’ll would ever think of doing that?

      Great comment!

      • I have always thought it supremely ironic that those who take the bible completely literally do so without realizing the violence they do to the very text they wish to venerate…

  3. Nancy B recently mentioned an article at Religious Tolerance (.org), which is a site I like a lot–very even-handed treatment of all religions. I recall reading a visitor essay (which, of course, I cannot now find to save my life. this is an amplification of the problem of not being able to find things in books in your own home:)) in which the writer talked about having been abused as a child. There followed an extremely pointed comparison of the relationship between an abused child and an abusive parent and the relationship between the fervently religious and their god. In both cases, all blame for anything “bad” that happens (to the child or to the religious person) is assumed to be his or her own fault. He or she “brought it on him(her)self”, and therefore deserved whatever punishment they received. It was frightening, and frighteningly accurate.

    I notice the same line of thinking in the tangled missive above,

    If we want God to destroy these things in this world we have to ask Him to destroy us, cuz we are the source of the problems. It’s our choice to sin. Did sin cause that disease? I don’t know, maybe a chemical someone was testing at some time did, but why was it tested? Sin probably!

      • Anonymous
      • October 22nd, 2010

      “…all blame for anything “bad” that happens (to the child or to the religious person) is assumed to be his or her own fault. He or she “brought it on him(her)self”, and therefore deserved whatever punishment they received.”

      Very true. I know this from personal experience. (Short story, I was abused (violence, not sexual). We thought such behaviour was normal, and that my slight wrongs deserved such punishment. I won’t belabour the point.)

      The opposite appalls me even more though. The willingness to take all the blame for problems, but ignore the hard work, and often heroism (Chilean miners, again, as a good example) that other people put into the good stuff, and give the credit to some unseen nebulous god. It’s not only childish, but very insulting to those who did the good work.

      • Bugger! Guess who that was…

    • Kelehe
    • October 22nd, 2010

    “why claim one’s going to bend over and take it up the poop chute”
    You lost me on this one, not cool.

    • Did I lose you because of a lack understanding or because I was using an analogy that you disapproved of? I never started this site to avoid hurting anyone’s feelings.

      To anyone else. Was thuis particular analogy over the top or confusing? Did I go to far? Not that I’m changing, just asking.

      • Seemed okay to me. It’s a common enough turn of phrase. Someone over-sensitive to gay issues might frown a tad, I suppose, but not to a great degree.

      • I guess I can see that interpretation too, but my meaning was someone who is acting like they are doing something solely for you but really enjoys or wants it that way is hardly being altruistic. It wasn’t meant as offensive to the gay community or the anal sex but hetero community. Like most of what I say, it’s meant to be a little shocking to pull people out of that sacred reverie they insulate their God in.

        To any gays in the readership, I apologize for the misunderstanding.

      • I’ve always understood it to mean “take a bullet in the ass for”, implying being the last one in retreat, covering your team-mates. Which is why I said ‘oversensitive’.

        Hint: Don’t google for “take one in the ass for” in an attempt to find the origin of the phrase, like I did. :-/ Thank Darwin I didn’t do a picture search. *sheesh*

  4. Mercy–this is where the conversation goes while I’m asleep?:)) This is what comes of living on the other side of the planet…

    • Yeah Amy, could you make it easier on us and just move a bit closer. There must be some spot midway between Daz and I. Nova Scotia? See what you can do and get back to us.

    • Nancy B
    • October 22nd, 2010

    I just want to say that though I commented on the article at religioustolerance.org, the article was originally brought up by someone else. Just trying to give credit where due, though I’m too lazy to find the posts and actually, you know, *give* the credit.

    But anyway, the comparison to child abuse gave me chills. That’s exactly what it is, and the idea of all those people going to church getting this psychological control abuse thingy – *shudder* That’s pretty horrifying: Something went wrong? It’s your own damn fault. And like Daz said, Something went right? It’s no thanks to you. *shudder again*

    • Alice
    • October 23rd, 2010

    I admire you for taking this guy on, KK. I used to be able to argue with theists, but I just can’t do it anymore because it’s impossible to have a meaningful dialog with someone who has such a radically different definition of what truth is. Also, it became apparent that all of their proofs/reasons/evidence for their truth came down to either divinely revealed knowledge (which isn’t, on all three counts) or deep personal feelings, and arguing about that is about as effective as wrestling with the wind.

    A perfectly good hobby, ruined by logic. :(

    • Amos M. Capps
    • October 27th, 2010

    why claim one’s going to bend over and take it up the poop chute

    Whenever I see this in a non-sexual context I tend to think of impalement.

    • Brother Ben
    • November 9th, 2010

    Anonymous :The opposite appalls me even more though. The willingness to take all the blame for problems, but ignore the hard work, and often heroism (Chilean miners, again, as a good example) that other people put into the good stuff, and give the credit to some unseen nebulous god. It’s not only childish, but very insulting to those who did the good work.

    Recognition of the hard work of others is important in our society, but there would be no need to assign credit if our motivation for working hard were not self-glorifying.

    In fact it is possible to work not just selflessly but for transcendent ideals (god, peace, whatever). In which case it most certainly should be those ideals which are lauded, because they are the ones that drove the accomplishment of the work.

    That being said, we should not assume the motivation for the rescue of the Chilean Miners. If they said they did if for God, then praise God the miners are safe.

    • You go ahead and praise a non-existent sky-fairy if it makes you feel good. I’ll be more generous and assign the credit to those who actually did the bloody work.

      Or shall we talk about the millions who also pray, and are prayed for, but end up dying all the time? It’s odd how this God person gets all the credit for the few that are saved by human ingenuity and bravery, but never the blame for the ones who aren’t.

      Oh I forgot. That’s punishment for ‘teh gays.’

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 42 other followers